The Man Who Could Live Forever, the Year’s Best Data Visualizations and Why I Am #nothumbled
This week on a layover in San Francisco I found out Henry and I had won another book award for The Future Normal. As I turned to LinkedIn, I saw no less than three friends who had also achieved some major accomplishment preface their sharing by saying they were “humbled.”
We should all stop saying that, and so I wrote about why.
Aside from my efforts to jumpstart the #nothumbled movement, there’s a great collection of non-obvious stories for you as usual this week. It starts with a man who thinks he can live forever (and might succeed), along with the year’s best data visualizations, Tinder’s tattoo takeover, the dangers of monoculturalism and how Twitter/X continues to get worse.
Stay curious,
The Man Who Thinks He Can Live Forever
| Bryan Johnson is technically 46 years old, but his biological age is eighteen. The life he leads to maintain this statistic has all the joy of an incarcerated monkey. For the past three years, he has built a life-extension system he calls Blueprint and combines extreme data collection with a mindset that considers eating a cookie or getting less than 8 hours of sleep as an “act of violence” against his body. The “system” for attempting to halt the aging process involves “downing 111 pills every day [and] sleeping with a tiny jet pack attached to his penis to monitor his nighttime erections.” If it seems extreme, the story of Blueprint and Johnson’s life itself is meant to be. Most of us wouldn’t accept this trade off. What’s the point of living longer without indulgences, you might wonder? But human progress has always been fueled by the sacrifices of extreme thinkers like Johnson. Unlike other ambitious scientists of the past, at least his experiments are mostly limited to his own body (and one true-believing female assistant). And it is conceivable that his efforts could unlock some tactics to help the rest of us add more healthy years onto our lifespans. So despite the strangeness of his life’s work, I hope he keeps going and maybe finds a piece of the immortality he seeks. His success may one day be good news for the rest of us who would like to add a few more years without giving up those cookies. |
| Every year the Data Visualization Society considers hundreds of entries to select its Information Is Beautiful Awards Shortlist winners. This year’s honorees include some fascinating entries such as an illustrated explanation of Russia’s deportation of Ukrainians, a digital double infopoem “reflecting on the insanely specific and biased inferences algorithms make about us,” and a graphic of plastic bag usage at UK supermarkets over a five year period. Several projects took personal screen time or streaming entertainment data and chose to visualize that in some unusual ways. The Binge Blanket, for example, is a hand woven piece where “each thread of the yarn depicts an hour of the binge from a day in 2021 and the colour depicts the genre of the media viewed.” Altogether the projects showcase not only how graphics can help us spotlight data that matters most, but also how visualized information can help us better understand ourselves. |
| “Contract cheating” is the practice of paying others to do your homework and it’s a $21 billion dollar industry that is “technically legal in Canada—and data suggests it’s become prevalent across post-secondary institutions.” Rationalizing their existence, one ghostwriting company founder argues that colleges are failing their students anyway with “false promises of prestige following the completion of their degrees” so it makes sense that students are getting help instead of stressing out over “assignments that have nothing to do with [their] career goals.” While ChatGPT is putting a short term dent in the revenue streams of some of these contract cheating firms, given the rise in AI detection tools in higher ed, it’s possible that the existence of these tools makes the idea of using ghostwriters to produce college essays even more normalized. The real danger, of course, is that this might eventually mean we’ll have an entire generation of younger workers incapable of communicating through writing and unwilling to endure the unpleasantness of doing any task they feel is unworthy of their time. |
| Got a tattoo from a past relationship that didn’t stand the test of time? For a few days in London, Tinder UK is hosting a tattoo studio takeover to help singles “start a new inked-up chapter in your dating journey” by turning those older tattoos into new art with new meaning. The beautiful underlying message of this campaign is that it’s ok to put yourself out there to find love again. Clearly, the whole thing is a promotion to get more people on Tinder, but it also happens to be based on a wonderfully empathetic strategy that might just help real people escape the lasting emotional scars from a past love lost. Before we get too complimentary about Tinder, though, it is also possible this is an extremely clever way to distract from the more controversial launch this same week of a $6000 per year Tinder Select membership tier that allows “VIP members” to send unsolicited messages to people they haven’t “matched” with)–or as one article put it, a way for “people with no game to message randos.” |
| The opposite of multiculturalism is monoculturalism – a society in which there is only one acceptable religion, mindset or system of behavior. Academic researchers around the world have warned against the dangers of monoculturalism for years, from the “thick” national identity of Bulgarians to political shifts in Malaysia. In the world of agriculture, monoculture (also known as monocropping) has led to disastrous results. Recently, tech commentator Shelly Palmer shared his own reflections on whether AI has the potential to dramatically accelerate humanity’s shift towards monoculturalism by threatening “the rich tapestry of human expression.” The more decision-making we cede to smart algorithms, the closer to this potential future we might get. Interestingly, it’s an article he first wrote several years ago – but his core argument is certainly worth re-reading today: “I can imagine a world filled with digital monocultures, isolated from one another by feedback loops … as a few artificial intelligences strive to algorithmically optimize our lives, it will be at the cost of our incredibly bad human decision-making. Which I’m sure we’re going to miss.” |
| Every week I always curate more stories than I’m able to explore in detail. Instead of skipping those stories, I started to share them in this section so you can skim the headlines and click on any that spark your interest: Penguin Random House takes on US book bans with Banned Wagon Tour The New WGA Contract Will Change How Hollywood Works Think Twitter/X Can’t Get Worse? Elon Musk Disables Option to Report Misinformation How Humans of Bombay Lost at Its Own Game SAP Announces Ambitious New Generative AI Assistant Joule The New American Classroom Has Bulletproof Windows and Safe Rooms Airbnb Is Offering a ‘Real Life’ Stay at Shrek’s Swamp in Scotland |
| Every week I spend hours going through hundreds of stories in order to curate this email. Looking for a speaker to inspire your team to become non-obvious thinkers through a keynote or workshop? Watch my new 2023 speaking reel on YouTube >> |
Want to share? Here’s the newsletter link:
https://mailchi.mp/nonobvious/387?e=e4ada04396
Copyright © 2023 Non-Obvious, All rights reserved.
Get this newsletter directly in your inbox every Thursday! Subscribe here >>
